“Football’s Coming Home”…but to which country? FIFA’s National Team Eligibility Rules Explained

By Owen Afriye on February 19, 2019 Posted in Football, Rules and regulations

Representing one’s country on the international stage has long been reported as the pinnacle of a footballer’s ambition. In present times, the development of international club competitions has challenged that notion. For fans of the English national representative team, the FIFA World Cup 2018 was a fantastic event, capturing mass national support for international football, as the Three Lions’ fourth place heroics restored national pride in the country’s ability at national representative level, whilst also uniting the nation during a period of political uncertainty.

The subject of international football, like any other international team sport, brings into play the issue of national team eligibility, with international stars such Diego Costa, Wilfried Zaha and the Boateng brothers (to name a few) considering the rules issued by FIFA to determine which nation or nations they are entitled to seek to represent.

Very recently, West Ham United’s newest prodigy, Declan Rice, has committed his future to seeking to represent England at full international level, despite having made several appearances for the Republic of Ireland at underage level, and having a few caps for the senior side – This case will be discussed in more detail below.

When it comes to eligibility for a national team, many may think that this is a straightforward process i.e. play for one team and one team only – the country of birth. However, these recent cases have highlighted that the situation is more complicated than that, taking account of, inter alia, differing circumstances of geography and citizenship, and on occasion can prove controversial.

The rules governing a player’s eligibility for a national representative team are summarised below.

Unexpected win for English football enthusiasts around the EU and heavy defeat for rights holders’ wallets

By Dickie Chan and Elsa Haj Houssain on February 18, 2019 Posted in Broadcasting, European Union, Football

As part of a continuous attempt to move away from geoblocking and towards a Digital Single Market (“DSM”), the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council agreed, last 13 December 2018, to facilitate access to sports radio content within the new EU broadcasting rules, a move which the Premier League has criticised. This comes much to the sports industry’s surprise as EU lawmakers and national governments had explicitly excluded sports coverage from these rules in discussions just over twelve months ago.

Until now, sports coverage had always been excluded from the EU’s aim to create seamless movement of internet content due to the specificities of the demand for it in each market in the EU, the high value of its rights, and the enhanced need to protect them. Under the EU’s new proposed broadcasting rules, broadcasters have the right to clear sports coverage for pan-European radio broadcasts under licensing as sports content falls within the scope of radio programmes which can air across the EU as long as they comply with national copyright rules in their home country. This means, for example, that a French broadcaster would be able to get a licence for Premier League matches, whereas under the current rules, which allow geoblocking, a listener in France cannot legally listen to football games broadcasted on BBC Radio 5 Live. Sports content is therefore included in the EU’s move towards a DSM.

FINA changes its stance after World Champion swimmers’ antitrust claims throw it into the deep end

By Elsa Haj Houssain and Susannah Bottriell on February 14, 2019 Posted in Competition, Olympics, Rules and regulations, Swimming

On 15 January 2019, the Fédération Internationale de Natation (“FINA”), the gatekeeper for access to the Olympic Games and World Championships, announced that swimmers are now free to participate in race meetings that are organised by independent organisers (which includes those that are neither related to FINA or members of FINA) and will not be banned from competing in major championships as a result of doing so.

This statement comes after three international champion swimmers, Thomas A. Shields (USA), Michael C. Andrew (USA) and Katinka Hosszu (Hungary) filed lawsuits in the Northern District of California on Friday 7 December 2018 against FINA following allegations that FINA boycotted a potential competition by the International Swimming League (“ISL”) which was planned to take place in Turin during December 2018. FINA had warned athletes that they may be banned from competing in the Olympics if they competed in the ISL competition. The swimmers sought compensation against FINA and an injunction for “clear antitrust violations arising from FINA’s complete control, by unlawful means, over the promotion and organization of international swimming competitions and its efforts to ensure that FINA, and only FINA, can determine what swimming athletes will be paid for their efforts.” The ISL also brought a separate suit, alleging that FINA behaviors were anticompetitive.

The claims focused on two key areas: (i) the low prize payments given by FINA to the athletes and (ii) the fact that FINA has used its position to boycott the efforts of a new professional league.

Avant Garde by name, avant-garde by nature: French Football Federation ruling threatens to stop real-life fantasy team

By Katie Smith on February 13, 2019 Posted in Broadcasting, Football, Intellectual Property, Law, Technology, Technology in Sport

When French sixth-tier side Avant Garde Caennaise (“AG Caen”) were founded in 1902, even the most forward-thinking supporters could not have imagined that the club would become the pioneers that they are today.

The Project

Two thousand fans currently manage the team, making decisions such as the team’s line up and substitutions, via a third party app called ‘United Managers’. The virtual managers, called ‘Umans’, decide on pre-game line-ups and in-game tactics. They have access to Opta Pro statistics and live streaming of training sessions and games and vote on the app to make strategy-critical decisions. The app delivers the tactics digitally for the dugout duo of Julien Le Pen and assistant Karim Ahmed Yahia to implement.

The United Managers project is based on a subscription model where users vote with coins on the app. Umans can pay for a premium subscription or earn greater voting rights with their increased use of the app. Fans can spend hours watching their team train, considering player selection, formations and suggesting substitutions. If Le Pen wants to make a substitution, the Umans also have the right to vote against his choice. This is fantasy football in reality.

But does it work? Are the Umans the next Guardiola? Well, the team’s performance seems to speak for itself in this regard. The team is currently top of Regional 1, one of the regional leagues at the sixth tier of French football, and is on course for promotion to the Championnat National 3 (the fifth division) if they keep up their current form.

UEFA TV: A glimpse into the future?

By Christopher Stevens-Smith on February 11, 2019 Posted in Broadcasting, Football, Intellectual Property, Media Rights

UEFA recently announced that it will be launching its own over the top (“OTT”) streaming platform within the next few months. When the provisionally named ‘UEFA TV’ goes live in time for the 2019/20 season, it will allow fans outside of Europe and North America to view Euro 2020 and future editions of the UEFA Nations League. Due to UEFA’s existing carriage agreements, it is unlikely that its premier club competitions, the Champions League and the Europa League, will be coming to UEFA TV until 2021 at the earliest.

Sports Shorts has discussed the evolving landscape of the sports broadcasting market and the growing prevalence of OTT platforms previously, but UEFA’s latest move signifies a change of tack from one of football’s major content licensors. Away from the lucrative European and North American broadcast markets, UEFA have presumably concluded that a direct-to-consumer approach will provide them with more revenue and more control over their relationship with consumers. In announcing the launch of UEFA TV, newly re-elected UEFA president Aleksander Čeferin spoke of UEFA’s desire to make football more accessible to fans across the globe. This may indicate a flexible pricing structure for the new platform, with single-match passes and/or tournament passes amongst the possible approaches that UEFA could take.

As markets mature, UEFA may seek to increase prices for UEFA TV to drive revenue growth, but its first mission will be to establish UEFA TV as a platform and garner sufficient subscribers to make it a profitable venture. Given the popularity of European football around the world, this would seem to be an inevitability, particularly once UEFA is able to offer the Champions League on its platform.

Raheem Sterling’s Penalty: If the referee knew, could he have overturned it?

By Simon Grossobel on November 9, 2018 Posted in Champions League, Football, Rules and regulations

The penalty given in the early stages of the Champions League fixture between Manchester City and Shakhtar Donetsk on Wednesday night has been hailed as amongst the “worst penalty decision[s] ever” by the BBC. Since there was no VAR and the fourth official appeared silent on the issue, the penalty stood and Gabriel Jesus put City up 2-0.

Aside from the “meme-ageddon” that has followed, Sterling has received criticism from his harshest critics who have claimed that he should have been more forceful in explaining to the referee what had actually happened. Others have highlighted the fact that he did not seek to claim a penalty in any way and that the referee immediately awarded the penalty when he went to ground.

What is the law and would any protestations have made a difference anyway?

Motorsport’s new proposed ‘W Series’ – a chance for female drivers to move to the front of the grid?

By Dillon Ravikumar on October 25, 2018 Posted in Formula One, Sponsorship, Women in Sport

“I don’t know whether a woman would physically be able to drive an F1 car quickly, and they wouldn’t be taken seriously.”

“I don’t know if they’ve got the mental aptitude to race hard, wheel-to-wheel.”

Regrettably, these inflammatory comments were not made by loose-lipped pub-goers, but by former F1 CEO Bernie Ecclestone and International Motorsports Hall of Famer Sir Stirling Moss, respectively.

Given their stature, the picture of an ‘all-boys club’ is easy to visualize. However, it appears that change is on the horizon. In May 2019, a new Formula 3 championship called the “W Series” will be launched, with a very distinct USP: all its racers will be women.

In an interview conducted by The Drive with W Series Communications Director, Matt Bishop, the following information has been gleaned:

W Series has appointed the British Racing & Sports Car Club (BRSCC) as the organizing club.
All the backing for season one—about £20 million (US $26.4 million) will be provided by one major shareholder, Sean Wadsworth.
W Series expects to sign 18 drivers for season one, all of whom must be at least 17 years of age, have competitive racing history, and must have completed an appraisal process stated to involve simulator and on-track testing, as well as engineering exams and physical fitness trials.
Those selected will be funneled into rigorous training programs, each run by instructors with Formula 1 experience. Tutelage by Grand Prix winner David Coulthard and simulator time will augment driving, while technical understanding will be aided by engineer Adrian Newey. Former McLaren management man Dave Ryan and former McLaren communications officer Matt Bishop will train drivers to master media interaction.
For the 2019 season, the W Series calendar is expected to encompass six half-hour sprint races at racetracks across Europe. In 2020 and beyond, the calendar could expand to regions such as the United States, Australia, and Asia.
At the end of the season, a prize money pot of $1.5 million will be divvied up between the entire grid. The winner will take home $500,000, and there will be decreasing payouts awarded all the way down to 18^th place in the final standings.

The $365 million man: Canelo lands bumper deal in changing sports broadcasting market

By Christopher Stevens-Smith on October 22, 2018 Posted in Boxing, Broadcasting, Media Rights, Player contracts

“The richest athlete contract in sports history”. That is how ESPN described the deal between boxer Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez and streaming service DAZN, which is worth a reported $365 million for 11 fights.

The agreement with Canelo sits alongside a broader “exclusive” partnership between DAZN and Canelo’s promoter, Golden Boy Promotions, which is due to run until 2023. DAZN has certainly made a statement to its competitors with the deal, as the UK-based company adds to its stable of combat-sport content.

The scale of Canelo’s remuneration has already prompted rival boxer Gennady Golovkin to consider his next move very carefully, given his current status as a broadcast ‘free-agent’.

Perhaps more significantly the deal is the latest indication of a shifting landscape in sports broadcasting, away from traditional linear TV broadcasters and towards standalone over the top (“OTT”) service providers such as DAZN. Indeed, Eleven Sports have recently made waves in the UK, acquiring the rights to broadcast various European football leagues, including La Liga and Serie A, via its streaming platform.

Will the American League Baseball finals be decided by the actions of a fan?

By Tim Lowles on October 18, 2018 Posted in Baseball, Rules and regulations

The beginning of October saw the start of the postseason in Major League Baseball and we are now at the finals stage in both the National and American League competitions.

In the American League, the LA Dodgers lead the Milwaukee Brewers 3-2 in the best of 7 series, whilst last night the Boston Red Sox sealed a 8-6 victory over the Houston Astros, to take a 3-1 lead in the series.

However, last night’s game was not without controversy as a two-run home run was cancelled as a result of the umpires’ finding that an Astro’s fan had interfered with the play.

What happened?

At the bottom of the first innings, and with George Springer on first base, Houston’s designated hitter Jose Altuve, smashed a fly ball to the right-hand side of the field in what looked like it would be a home run.

Red Sox right-fielder, Mookie Betts, launched himself backwards in an attempt to make the catch but in the process closed his glove too early, meaning the ball dropped back into the field of play, with both batsmen making it home safely.

However, following the play, the right-field umpire ruled that Altuve was out as a result of “spectator interference”. Protests ensued from the Astro’s bench before, having taking their time to consider the replays in more detail, the Umpires upheld the original decision with Altuve out and Springer having to return to first base.

A video of the incident can be viewed on the MLB twitter account here.

What are the rules?

Ben Stokes & Alex Hales: Disciplinary Matters in England and Wales Cricket

By Dillon Ravikumar on October 17, 2018 Posted in Cricket, Discipline, Governance, Rules and regulations

Given its escalation all the way to the Bristol Crown Court, even the casual sports fan will have noted the media furore regarding Ben Stokes and the street brawl he engaged in last September.

Although Stokes was found not guilty for the offence of affray, he has not escaped all liability for his actions just yet.

At the same time as Stokes was charged by the Avon and Somerset Police, both Stokes and Alex Hales were charged internally by the England governing body for cricket, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB).

What were they charged with?

Both players were referred to the independent Cricket Discipline Committee (CDC) and charged with two counts of breaching ECB directive 3.3, which states:

“No participant may conduct themselves in a manner or do any act or omission at any time which may be prejudicial to the interests of cricket or which may bring the ECB, the game of cricket or any cricketer or group of cricketers into disrepute.”

These types of clauses in governing bodies’ regulations are commonly used as sweeper provisions, to punish participants for actions away from the field of play.

How will the disciplinary process work?